- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:05, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Waita Uziga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be a non-notable manga creator, fails WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE. Finding sources is difficult in this case, as his material seems to be extreme verging on the obscene, so it's little surprise no one wants to admit to reading it. But I can't find any significant coverage of him in reliable sources beyond the trivial. Robofish (talk) 23:57, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Have you tried looking for Japanese sources? WhisperToMe (talk) 00:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That thought just occurred to me - no, I haven't. I don't read Japanese, so I can't do that very well, but I ran his entry on Japanese Wikipedia[1] through Google Translate and that didn't seem to provide anything more in the way of reliable sources. Robofish (talk) 11:36, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Waita Uziga comes up several times in AnimeNation's "Ask John" column.[2] (WP:A&M/ORS#General) It may not be enough to pass WP:NOTE, but it is a step in that direction. —Farix (t | c) 12:52, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Week delete barring the discovery of any more coverage by reliable third-party sources. —Farix (t | c) 14:26, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm seeing no reliable sources. --Sloane (talk) 15:23, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.