- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted. Blanked by author, garbage anyway. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:59, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Walnut Rage™ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Obviously needs deletion. Jab843 (talk) 16:44, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per nom and common sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joefridayquaker (talk • contribs) 17:17, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree with speedy delete. Original author posted a likely fabrication, then deleted it. Regards, RJH (talk) 17:20, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.