- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:11, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Warmcut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Disputed PROD. An admitted neologism, no sources apart from Urban Dictionary. While I find the term interesting, it fails WP:NEO and WP:MADEUP, and apart from UD, there appear to be no relevant Google hits. Acroterion (talk) 23:09, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless reliable sources can be found that discuss this neologism (I've had a brief look myself but can find nothing). Wiw8 (talk) 23:16, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO, possibly WP:SYNTHESIS, WP:MADEUP, WP:HOAX ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 23:26, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO The Locke (talk) 00:12, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom and my PROD. In particular, urbandictionaries is user generated content, so it can't be used to verify this article. --Amalthea 04:45, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It is, as they say, not even a thing. Graymornings(talk) 11:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment is it appropriate to WP:SNOW this yet? ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 02:43, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Blizzard conditions. Borderline speedy. Delete already. Graymornings(talk) 10:29, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.