Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wasim Akram (Producer)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. per WP:SNOW Ϫ 22:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Wasim Akram (Producer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedural. Disputed prod by original author (and subject of article). Fails to meet adequate notability. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:50, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This article provides no links for reference except Facebook and self created pages (by this author). All his works are either not released or in pre-production phase. I don't find any relevant results at Google for any of his works. Other articles like Gayathri 2013, Sameena Kausar, Sara Entertainment Pvt Ltd and Sridhar Teegala are also created by Wasirg (original author) which are either unsourced BLP, link to Facebook or don't have any references at all. He (subject of article) may be considered notable in future, but not now. trunks_ishida (talk) 18:07, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, if not speedy delete. This person has no notability and I'm almost 100% positive that the editor who added the pages is Akram himself since he listed the profile as "my facebook profile". This is pretty much just advertisement for his company and projects. There's no reliable sources out there.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 18:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Speedy delete per A7. Obviously self-promotional. Also, some one should warn (if not block) User talk:Wasirg for creating self promotional articles. Cocoaguy ここがいい 00:24, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 03:49, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete purely self-promotional. — Abhishek Talk 04:00, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – After some searching, I have found zero coverage for this individual in reliable sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the above. I'm unable to find significant coverage for this person in independent reliable sources. Gongshow Talk 19:51, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with enthusiasm. Unverifiability hints strongly of WP:HOAX and along with similar film article Dead Morning, as well as the director article Sridhar Teegala, and the ones for Gayathri (2013 film) and all created by single purpose User:Wasirg all seem to be set to promote the non-notable producer, his film company, and his films. None have verifiability. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:21, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete promotional spam--Sodabottle (talk) 15:12, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I think that this could probably be a snow close at this point in time, to be honest.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:10, 2 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.