Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Watara Supervision internals

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was convert to speedy G7. Non-admin closure due to change of process. TRKtv (daaaaah!) 17:42, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Watara Supervision internals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Big images, self-references, and unencyclopedicity all make deletion for this article. TRKtv (daaaaah!) 02:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per nom. clearly unencyclopedic. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 02:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Might be usable if it were made more encyclopedic, but that would take a lot of work. Realkyhick 04:00, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Clearly original research. CiaranG 15:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete OR.-MsHyde 23:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• No contest I originally wrote this page, and a similar page for the Mega Duck as an extension of my article on the Mega Duck/Cougar Boy, to show the remarkable similarities between their external appearance and internal electronics of the Watara Supervision and the Cougar Boy/Mega Duck, and to learn interested parties the inner workings of such devices. But these articles ended up more like an article for a "How things work" book than an encyclopedic article. I understand that Wikipedia is not a "how things work" book, so I have salvaged a bit from both articles, and put them on my home page. Mahjongg 00:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• G7 both pages as above. I am changing this to G7 and adding a G7 template on the Mega Duck internals page. TRKtv (daaaaah!) 04:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.