- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 05:18, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article consists of a simple dictionary definition, plus one seemingly unrelated external link fchd 10:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Improve If someone gets more info or some photos about this stuff (even some reports or whatsoever) I think it might be interesting to someone (Internet is full of geeks) LeChimp 15:17, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Modding watches for "improved performance"? I suspect a hoax. Delete. Demiurge 13:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no substantial amount of content exists or is likely to exist to deserve an article on its own. —Tokek 13:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nocontext, WP:V, and being more-or-less a dicdef. Now off to wind my watch. SkierRMH 01:37, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; already covered in watch. Yuser31415 22:46, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.