- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:35, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- WeDigTV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No available outside references beyond (paid?) media links. No recent references at all (the site appears to have been dead for the past two years and so doesn't even advertise). Inappropriate content for Wikipedia, and the article's tone would need serious improvement if it were to stay. Wlwwybrn (talk) 10:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 01:16, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per nom. --MZMcBride (talk) 17:31, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.