Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weapons and Vehicles of Resistance: Fall of Man

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 22:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weapons and Vehicles of Resistance: Fall of Man

Lists of X for video games violates WP:NOT as well as established procedure in the WikiProject Computer and video games Masem 16:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

delete I don't agree that "List of X for video games" is always deletable, but this list is clearly useless. — brighterorange (talk) 17:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No real content here, and more complete pages have been deleted in the past. Garrett^Talk 20:26, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Pointless weapon list. Violates WP:NOT and non-notable. --Scottie theNerd 13:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and perhaps Merge It is just a list of weapons with no content but may be worth putting in the main resitance article. Da Big Bozz 18:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Disagreed: CVG articles refrain from placing full lists of items and equipment as per WP:NOT as well as following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer and video games article guidelines. Information should be presented in a brief encyclopedic manner and not as a list. --Scottie theNerd 01:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: just expanded it. Personally think that the old one in the R:FOM article should be used, but I'd have to find that in the history.Dboyz-x.etown 04:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Why should the article be expanded? Arguments put forward point out that the article is unencyclopedic and non-notable. Expanding it won't change that. --Scottie theNerd 14:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lacks independent sources, unencyclopedic information. Wickethewok 14:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unencyclopedic information, lacks notability. Wiki's is not a collection of info. BIGNOLE (Question?) (What I do) 19:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 03:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It's ugly, small, has no sources and is pretty much unnecessary.DreamingLady 08:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional Keep: Keep only if it covers new or novel items/concepts for gaming, otherwise delete. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 00:34, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lists of items in games aren't notable as determined by countless precedents. Koweja 20:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.