Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weathervane effect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep in some form. Merge doesn't need AFD to decide. Petros471 12:19, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a WP:NEO based on this paragraph: "This question is not usually discussed in texts, FAA documents, or by most flight instructors. It seems obvious when explained, but unfortunately most resources just state that a banked airplane turns." About 800 Google hits but very few seem relevant to this article. Metros232 14:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep term appears to be in use; article needs citations and copyedit. Tom Harrison ^Talk 14:38, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Aircraft flight mechanics. There are currently no sub-articles on specific elements of flight dynamics. -- Slowmover 15:29, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, but only with substantial fixing up. Nationalparks 17:45, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge Eluchil404 03:09, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.