- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:03, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- WebPurify (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The company doesn't seem to meet the notability requirements ether for corporations or articles in general. Although there are a number of sources, most proved not to be verifiable. Those which were either didn't discuss the organisation or their product, or are unreliable - one is a press release, three are self published by the company, and one is a wiki. Searches for any independent coverage in Google News and other databases didn't turn up any hits beyond the one press release already in the article. Bilby (talk) 12:44, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nice job with a good faith attempt by nominator Bilby (talk · contribs) to find coverage in secondary sources, unfortunately, this subject matter just doesn't have it, yet. — Cirt (talk) 15:42, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:01, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:01, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Looks spammy. There's no credible references except for one article in 2011 and much of the talk in the article is flattery about the company with references but not actually in citations given. Unless we can locate references ABOUT the company and not something that mentions it in a brief passing, remove it. Cantaloupe2 (talk) 06:18, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.