This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was No Consensus default to Keep. Essjay · Talk 08:46, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
Blatant advertising. --malathion talk 05:00, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Advertising - Chairboy 05:01, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, advertising. Alex.tan 05:16, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, advertising. — JIP | Talk 07:11, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Advertising. Not notable - --213.179.58.29 08:30, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per the above. --Mysidia 08:31, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, ad. --Merovingian (t) (c) 11:53, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable--BirgitteSB 18:38, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Comment - Within the web business ___domain, they are notable, and are listed on NASDAQ (WSSI). But the article needs to be redone totally to get rid of press-release-ness. Eclipsed 02:38, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Votes after edit of 7 August:
- Keep as a public company stub. Eclipsed 02:56, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - notable within their field. Rob Church 02:58, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as it recorded notable web statistics. --minghong 08:03, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
.