Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web Intelligence Consortium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:19, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Web Intelligence Consortium

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Web Intelligence Consortium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability; page likely created by org, or somebody connected to org; questionable if org still exists, logo from more than a decade ago LikeMeercats (talk) 00:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment In addition to my initial nom, look at the sources, primary not secondary LikeMeercats (talk) 00:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Kpgjhpjm 03:48, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 08:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 22:20, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: The organisation is involved in a "Web Intelligence Chile" conference next month [1] so does still exist. AllyD (talk) 08:30, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, their own website is littered with 404 links and is little updated, the article refs are 404 or primary. I think they do something but it isn't enough for inclusion here. Szzuk (talk) 20:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.