- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:32, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Web Sked (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Software with no evidence of notability or needing its own article. Possibly one Google hit apart from this article. In spite of being Unreferenced original author has still removed the unref tag. PROD removed by original author with no attempt at explanation Malcolma (talk) 08:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete An advanced Google search for exactly "Web Sked" excluding "Wikipedia" brings up a mere 207 results. A few being the company's web site and some others that don't seem to apply. I also can't find much to reference the article and the author can't seem to provide it.--NortyNort (Holla) 11:13, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unambiguous advertising: It was created as the first all-in-one solution to contain the media schedules for multiple media channels... Designed to address the many shortcomings of existing solutions, Web Sked has important features that promote ease of use for agency and client side users. When it's this bad, notability's a side issue. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:41, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - lacks coverage in reliable sources -- Whpq (talk) 14:56, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Pure weapons-grade vanispamcruftisement lacking WP:RS to support meeting WP:Notability (software) inclusion criteria, or even WP:GNG … Happy Editing! — 70.21.13.215 (talk · contribs) 22:43, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.