Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web Technology Specialist
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete both. Sr13 is almost Singularity 04:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Web Technology Specialist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
not encyclopaedic and not generally true Xorkl000 10:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- while there is no doubt that many companies must have a role called "Web Technology Specialist" its not generally accepted that such a role would universally have these exact activities and responsibilities attached to it. This article maybe true for a small number of specific companies and organisations, but it is not generally true. --Xorkl000 11:06, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unsourced, original research. Willing to change to keep if someone fixes it. T Rex | talk 11:07, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - i don't believe it is fixable. This is a specific job description, i just can't see how it can be generalised --Xorkl000 11:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:NOT a job board. Besides, this is probably copyvio of some company's job listing. Argyriou (talk) 17:16, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages because it has exactly the same problem (and the same substantial author):
- Internet Marketing Program Manager (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) --Xorkl000 21:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both. Wikipedia is not a repository of job descriptions, particularly ones whose details will vary widely from one employer to the next. --Dhartung | Talk 00:23, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both per WP:NOT and for non-encyclopedic content given that the description is not generally applicable. Askari Mark (Talk) 03:03, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.