Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web media makers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deletion (A7, G11). (non-admin closure) AllyD (talk) 09:01, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Web media makers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No credible assertion of notability. Article also reads as a promotional piece. TomStar81 (Talk) 05:29, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article on a web design and marketing firm by a WP:SPA account with probably COI. The local award may be sufficient to avoid CSD A7 but there is no evidence of the award's selection criteria or notability. More broadly, I am seeing nothing to indicate this is more than a firm going about its business. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 12:56, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: PROMO -- this is what this article is and created for. It easily fails the requirement for inclusion on encyclopedia. Anup [Talk] 19:54, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per AllyD's accurate analysis. SPAM article created by a SPA account. The claimed award is unremarkable. Cavarrone 11:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.