- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 05:42, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Web view engine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced article by a new user that basically promotes one product. SpeakFree (talk) 14:29, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 17:03, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 17:04, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete should have been speedy in my opinion, since it is clearly an ad. (Perhaps criterion G11 would be more appropriate, A7 was declined, saying it did not apply to "tooIs"?) I would add that Google's seach add-on to Microsoft Internet Explorer seems to do a somewhat similar thing, so this product is not notable. The web page suspisciously does not say anything about the organization who developed it. W Nowicki (talk) 17:05, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Borderline G11. IMHO this is an advertisement masquerading as an article. It defines a term and then gives a link to a product. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:51, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.