- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty☀ 02:11, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A term (a neologism, one might say) which the article claims enjoys "considerable international currency", but for which (as a common noun) I can find no evidence whatever (it's used in plenty of tradenames, but that's not the subject or claim of the article). I would contend that this is unverified, apparently unverifiable, and is a non-notable neologism or meme which should be deleted from Wikipedia, and restored only when it has gained the notoriety it claims. Finlay McWalter | Talk 18:50, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete should be removed as it seems to be an advert for a book -- Lockeandload
- Delete per nom. DarthVader 23:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable, unverifiable neologism, i.e. protologism. Stifle (talk) 21:28, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per prior arguments. Mostly seems like an attempt at free advertising. —204.42.20.4 01:15, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. It's non-notable among other things. Radagast83 15:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.