- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sango123 23:50, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable software. Fails WP:SOFTWARE. Yes, two articles have been written on the subject but that work is not an independent source since SourceForge tells us that the two project admins for this software are neunm and schultem, most probably the authors of these articles. Google finds a lot of hits for webdip but in fact very few for "webdip + database" [1] or for "webdip + decision" [2]. No significant third party coverage. Pascal.Tesson 00:18, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; fails WP:SOFTWARE criteria.--TBCTaLk?!? 01:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Ogdred 03:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Quatloo 04:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nomination is on the money. I note that User:Schultem also contributed to the article. Guy 11:53, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Storkk 13:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above reasons.UberCryxic 19:22, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and Guy. Michael Kinyon 13:28, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.