- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Webnode (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete)
- History of Webnode (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete)
- (View log)
Looks like a dime-a-dozen hosting service, only referenced to the website itself. Delete (or restore redirect to web hosting service). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 08:42, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
SpeedyDelete - Not notable, written as an advert. I'm trying to rewrite but so much of this is promotional... Greg Tyler (t • c) 10:06, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Comment. I deleted the history article as a copyvio. --Closedmouth (talk) 15:19, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:22, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 02:49, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (no redirect). No third-party sources listed, and nothing in the text of the article to distinguish this host from the crowd. Zetawoof(ζ) 04:19, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unlikely search term for a redirect. Just kill it as advertisement. Gigs (talk) 09:19, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.