Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webster Kehr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 16:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Webster Kehr

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Kehr is a fringe theorist who is entirely self published. The article relies too heavily on his self published claims to describe his background. The article relies mainly on blog posts and other non-reliable sources and fails to show any reliable source indepth coverage of Kehr to pass general notability guidelines, and nothing even remotely approaching meeting academic notability guidelines. John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:13, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:30, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:30, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:30, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Pretty much nothing of any significance showing up at any of the resources at Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Sagecandor (talk) 02:39, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, concur with Nom and Shawn in Montrael, I can't find RS either.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Searches did not find enough in-depth coverage to show that they pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as trivial and unconvincing and nothing at WorldCat. SwisterTwister talk 22:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.