Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weekend Radio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:49, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weekend Radio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV. Little or no coverage aside from passing references in stories about radio station on which it airs (WCLV), or for station's founder (Robert Conrad). Propose to delete target and create redirect to WCLV. Levdr1lp / talk 18:13, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Levdr1lp / talk 18:20, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Levdr1lp / talk 18:22, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. If this show has been nationally syndicated on dozens of different public radio stations since 1982, as the coverage indicates [1][2], then it ought to pass the notability test at WP:RPRGM. Even if we conclude it doesn't currently warrant its own article, I don't see why one would delete this rather than merge it, adding some content and footnotes to the merge target. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly did not see anything about this show syndicating nationally "to over 80 outlets", so thank you for finding the Cleveland.com link. Still, though, I'm hesitant to keep a stand-alone article given the lack of coverage on the show itself. The link focuses on Robert Conrad, the show's host, not the show. Levdr1lp / talk 21:09, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 04:48, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:31, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.