Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weekend Sexcapades

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weekend Sexcapades

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable erotic film, lacking significant coverage or other indications of notability per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 18:43, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:51, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:51, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 18:53, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there is a lack of reliable sources coverage for this film. For example it has no entry at all at Rotten Tomatoes, and does not pass WP:GNG in my view Atlantic306 (talk) 01:51, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails not only NFILM but probably GNG as well. I found no reliable sources, only database entries and a single tv listing (which is a short passing mention). Anonymous 7481 (talk) 14:08, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 03:09, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.