Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wei Han (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Bliss Media. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wei Han

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was deleted in an AfD discussion. It has now been restored, but the issues from the most recent AfD persist: there is a bit of a citation overkill in the article, but none of the sources is about the subject of the article - rather they are about films promoted or imported by the company which she is the CEO of, and sometimes (not always) her name is mentioned in passing. It is not at all clear that the company is notable, and in any case notability is not inherited. There's been some COI issues but that's not really the problem now - the problem is lack of notability, plain and simple. bonadea contributions talk 20:17, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 20:31, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 20:31, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 20:31, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Bliss Media, since the articles are almost identical (and built by the same SPA/meatpuppets). As mentioned in the previous AFD, she is more like an investor rather than an actual filmmaker. Timmyshin (talk) 19:54, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:02, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

merge' as suggested. Should be covered, butnot in a separate article. DGG ( talk ) 05:46, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as above, seems a valid option Atlantic306 (talk) 18:18, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.