- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:42, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Wes melcher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
In my opinion, this person does not meet the notability criteria. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - article does not meet WP:N. Salesmen, CEOs, et cetera are not inherently notable. - DustFormsWords (talk) 01:42, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - shamelessly promotional; non-notable figure. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - sources are largely promotional and self-serving. Rodhullandemu 23:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- The sources are promotional. Nothing there to suggest notability.--Jessica Gordon (talk) 01:19, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete sources are low quality. MiRroar (talk) 22:10, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.