Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Will the Neighbours Say? Live

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. No reliable sources, and the Keep votes don't have a policy-based rationale. One editor voted Keep, conditional on reliable sources being added. There are still none. Article could easily be recreated if sources were found. The third article included in this AfD has some references, but they are not about the specific tour that is the subject. EdJohnston (talk) 05:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What Will the Neighbours Say? Live

Non-Notable tour. I am also nominating the following articles for the same reasons:

Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 21:07, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:42, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all. This group's visual appeal, and their tackling whether to sing live or not, and the commercial reactions to that, are essential elements of the understanding of this act. Thus, articles about their tours are just as notable as the many existing articles about their albums, their songs, and their video releases. Wasted Time R (talk) 22:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

None of those arguments address the nomination or any reasons why it should stay according to the General Notability Guidelines. You may like it, but that isn't a reason to keep it. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 22:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no doubt that Girls Aloud easily clear the WP:BAND bar. The problem is that the article in question has no significant sources - just one promotional external link. Conditional keep, with the condition being that sources independent of the group and label covered this one-month tour (and the others, too). In this case, articles from local news sites would be ideal. B.Wind (talk) 03:38, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 06:07, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:03, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails to meet WP:GNG. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 22:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, they are both notable events that have occured!! Liamr02 —Preceding undated comment was added at 22:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Simply having occurred is not enough to make something notable. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 02:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.