Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What is architecture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:32, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is architecture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

contested prod and contested redirect. Unreferenced essay. RadioFan (talk) 13:54, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as failing Wikipedia:NOT#ESSAY. An interesting topic to discuss, somewhere else. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 14:08, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Fails WP:OR - particularly the statement that Bill Clinton was an architect. Tevildo (talk) 14:25, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Essay. Joe Chill (talk) 14:58, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - We already have an article on Architecture. If anything in this article can be supported by reliable sources, it should be moved to that article. The rest is OR. Blueboar (talk) 15:25, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge- This has a bit of useful information, though not much, that could be incorporated into Architecture. Otherwise, Delete. Hello, My Name Is SithMAN8 (talk) 16:33, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - architecture is the article we need to have, not this one. LadyofShalott 16:46, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia is not a repository for schoolwork Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 19:31, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to architecture, copy content to Talk:Architecture for proposed addition, nothing to merge at this time. Lots of new editors type "what is x" into the search box, expecting to get an answer. We should create redirects that reflect editorial expectations and redirect them accordingly. Viriditas (talk) 04:31, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note Deleted AFD notice has been restored --RadioFan (talk) 13:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Let me guess, it's due Monday. Although some mother hen might come along and polish up the grammar and put in some paragraph breaks at the right places, you won't learn anything that way. Mandsford (talk) 20:38, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.