Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/When we are together

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 02:58, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When we are together (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Not notable song. Macy's123 ^{(review me)} 23:02, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete-per nom. Why is it even an article?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think this would fall under any of the criteria for speedy deletion.Redfarmer (talk) 23:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oh my bad..I forgot.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Are you sure? Seems like a pretty clear-cut A7 to me. SingCal 21:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable album song. Fails WP:MUSIC. Redfarmer (talk) 23:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 17:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as I originally explained in my prod. Why, oh why, did someone decide to take this to AfD after it had already been prodded for three days? Where the hell is the sense in that? J Milburn (talk) 17:07, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom. SingCal 21:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.