- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 10:44, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Why Paint Cats (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable book, as far as I can tell. Author himself may even be non-notable the the criteria set out at WP:N. I've been unable to find any sources about it... The Cavalry (Message me) 02:25, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I'm pretty good about searching for book related stuff and was able to find a lot of sources that discussed it. I didn't find all of the ones that I know are out there, but enough to show that it passes WP:NBOOK.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 11:57, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Sources added by Tokyogirl79 make this pretty safe. Tigerboy1966 18:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:SNOWFLAKE, good reception section satisfying WP:GNG. Diego (talk) 07:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.