Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why is indigenous education different to non-indigenous education

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:36, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why is indigenous education different to non-indigenous education

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Personal essay and to the extent it's encyclopedic it's original research Shadowjams (talk) 09:10, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOT. Content is unsourced and is not salvageable. GregorB (talk) 10:58, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Content is probably a worthwhile discussion, sounds something similar to something i did back a year ago during my HSC, but until some reliable sources are put in, and there's a Neutral POV, it can't be considered to be notable. Nath1991 (talk) 12:03, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, personal essay and/or soapbox piece. No references or sources. JIP | Talk 13:41, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as Wikipedia is not a place for personal essays. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 18:14, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 01:32, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I wish there was a speedy delete criterion for this. St Anselm (talk) 01:36, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not an encyclopedia article. Finding sources (which I have no doubt could be found) would not address this basic point. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 02:51, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Clearly an original essay. — C M B J 05:06, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTESSAY. The title alone isn't even encyclopedic. Erpert (let's talk about it) 17:22, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.