Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why new manditory security measures are necessary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:56, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: This article is a letter/proposal that is pure OR and riddled with POV. --Hetar 18:49, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Heycos 18:50, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - clearly an editorial. Wickethewok 18:51, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete 100% Unencyclopedic. Bige1977 18:52, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above. (By the way, this had apparently been on PROD when the AfD was placed, I have removed the PROD as it is on AfD. This is not a contestation.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:58, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete OR, Soapbox, and title misspelled to boot. Fan1967 19:08, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Soapbox and original research. —ERcheck @ 20:00, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for reasons self-evident. Danny Lilithborne 21:02, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Grandmasterka 07:05, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Detain, hold incommunicado, torture, deny due process, and delete, per WP:NOR and WP:NPOV. Barno 18:30, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.