Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wickedness

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spebi 04:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wickedness (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Dictionary entry combined with non-notable, unsourced information. Flex (talk/contribs) 17:53, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete without prejudice; part dicdef, part dab page. JJL 19:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. At best, some of this might become a dab page, but otherwise Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Wryspy 21:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Wikipedia is not Wiktionary. Masterpiece2000 12:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.