- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Weird. T. Canens (talk) 01:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Wierd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. One passing mention in the definiton of another phrase in a book. Some mentions on blogs/ forums etc (chiefly as an instance of a correct spelling of "wierd") but no significant coverage. Pontificalibus (talk) 14:17, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- There are plenty of alternatives in the existing article history to choose from, that don't require the deletion tool or an administrator in order to revert to, including this version and this version. Uncle G (talk) 11:36, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy redirect. This content was already deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wierd (programming language), and none of the entries on the disambig version Uncle G links to would be found at the title. —Korath (Talk) 12:16, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.