Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiggly Worm Productions
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Opting for deletion here due to arguments by single-purpose accounts, as well as the fact that the article does not assert any notability. --Coredesat 04:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:spa|username}} ; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}} . |
- Wiggly Worm Productions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable company. Most of the few Google hits are for an unrelated company in the UK. Article creator has removed maintenance tags without improving the article. He had also created bio pages for the principals of the company, which were all A7 speedied. --Finngall talk 15:50, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't even assert notability, let alone have any. tomasz. 16:40, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Part of an underground scene and recognized by many more than you would think. Recognized in the IMDB, was easier accessed in google 3-4 years ago, but that just makes it history. User: CharlesHackley
- keep. don't see a reason why it should be deleted. google hits mean nothing. opiomi — Opiomi (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- keep. User: Skeetown — Skeetown (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete as NN company. Wildthing61476 20:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete Unnotable indy film company. All mentioned individuals and films are also unnotable. No refs from third party sources. 99DBSIMLR 17:47, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Smacks of suckpuppetry. 99DBSIMLR 17:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.