Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wii release data
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 04:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This information is already present in Wii, verbatim. I see no need for a separate article for this. tgies 08:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Hangon. Jecowa 08:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It's no longer verbatim. I created this article as a split from the Wii article to reduce the size of the Wii article. So far I have brought the size of the Wii article down to 47kb from 58kb. It would be nice to be able to keep this data in a seperate article while limiting the Wii article to the data on English-speaking countries. Is this acceptable? Jecowa 08:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep Great info and now broken up into better categories... so im not ready to delete just yet. MrMacMan 09:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Mergeto Wii. Do we really need a seperate article. --ElectricEye (talk) 11:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Comment We don't need separate articles, but by separating them reduces clutter on the Wii article. Compare the size of the release data section of the Wii article to that of the Wii release data article. Splitting this section into a new article is desirable per Wikipedia:Summary style. This is also touched on at Wikipedia:Article size. Jecowa 11:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I see. --ElectricEye (talk) 04:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment We don't need separate articles, but by separating them reduces clutter on the Wii article. Compare the size of the release data section of the Wii article to that of the Wii release data article. Splitting this section into a new article is desirable per Wikipedia:Summary style. This is also touched on at Wikipedia:Article size. Jecowa 11:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep --ElectricEye (talk) 04:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, breaking out shortened the original article while maintaining useful well-sourced information. (I'm still not buying one). - Mgm|(talk) 12:04, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, for the above reason (minus personal comment). Just64helpin 17:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Sosb 22:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Okay, you've convinced me :D tgies 22:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Uh... did the person requesting article deletion just vote to keep? MrMacMan 23:04, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. yeah no kidding kid get with the program we're trying to run an internet here tgies 04:59, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Uh... did the person requesting article deletion just vote to keep? MrMacMan 23:04, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep Can be made into a great article. Sharkface217 05:22, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Wii, will be irrelevant in a few months. Noclip 21:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for now, anyway Tempest115 21:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep renominate in a few months FirefoxMan 00:33, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A needed split now that it's no longer current information. -Ryanbomber 13:23, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.