- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was merged and redirected. Johnleemk | Talk 11:32, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism. Ashibaka (tock) 03:52, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. I'm usually against neologisms, but this one appears to be in fairly widespread use, and it may well be useful for Wikipedia to provide a definition, being a natural place to look for the concept. —HorsePunchKid→龜 2005-12-03 06:18:32Z
- I agree it should be covered somewhere, but this is a dicdef. Merge and redirect to Wiki until it's matured into a non-dicdef stub. - Mgm|(talk) 16:58, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to wiki, as the other editor said; maybe eventually it will deserve a separate article, but it's not there yet. *Dan T.* 15:21, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect per Mgm. Stifle 19:35, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to wiki -- Dalbury(Talk) 00:36, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.