- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 20:41, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- WikiPing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable protocol completely unsourced. No hits in google books. Two hits in google scholar: one patent (did not read), and a mention in passing in a paper in the typical style of academic citations, which cites... Wikipedia as source (LOL). Pcap ping 18:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 18:13, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; non-notable protocol that lacks any real sources, surprised it didn't cite itself. KaySL (talk) 18:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this protocol. Joe Chill (talk) 21:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above DRosin (talk) 22:06, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.