- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- WikiPoint (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I haven't been able to find any sources that attest to the importance or significance of this software; fails WP:N. Incidentally, it isn't mentioned in the three 'see also' pages. News results here don't help. Delete. Bridgeplayer (talk) 19:58, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Minor product - Never seen anything of possible use as WP:RS, doubtful that more is coming given intervening improvements in Sharepoint. MrZaiustalk 03:02, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 07:23, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Absolutely no reliable source coverage. --Cybercobra (talk) 09:31, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 15:32, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.