Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiSearch Toolbar
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 23:17, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable program, that can't be downloaded due to technical errors on its ad-infested website. -- Zanimum 18:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep, but needs expanding badly This article could be expanded in order to be in the notable range. Diez2 18:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Please explain how further details could prove it to be notable? -- Zanimum 14:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails to meet software notability guidelines. Zetawoof(ζ) 19:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Zetawoof. Canadian-Bacon t c 21:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above, plus if the links broken then its basically nonexistant... Wisdom Like Silence 00:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete ...it's a toolbar. For Wikipedia (needless self-reference). It seems these days every programmer's first project is "hey, let's make a toolbar extension". And it can't even be downloaded right now. Yawn. Anyway, toolbars, browser extensions etc. have to, in my opinion, justify their existence really well; they're not stand-alone apps, after all. They have to be exceptionally well known. At best, this is material that should be taken to Wikipedia:Tools, which is fine for this sort of content; it would just need to be completely redone for inclusion in there. If it's kept in the article space, it's facing some stiff standards. (Think of it this way: Is it fit for including into Wikipedia's list of user-contributed helper tools? Maybe. Is it anywhere near as famous as, say, Google Toolbar or AdBlock? Eh...) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 16:15, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.