- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 07:43, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Another non notable wikisite. Their About page has logged 114 visits, 2 of which were me. Delete. kingboyk 10:40, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 11:37, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unremarkable. -- Krash (Talk) 16:30, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, it's not a small wiki, look at the statistics. Give me time (I'm the creator), to improve the article. If it gets deleted right away, after I put it up, I can't really improve it can I? --Tom 17:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Mate, we have standards of inclusion here based on notability - see WP:WEB. I wish you well with your project, I really do (as a lazy would be Mediawiki developer myself I can see you've done a good job) but the link you've provided only strengthens my case. You have 13 registered users. To get a Wikipedia article you need to have thousands of users, preferably tens of thousands, or be very notable in some other way. You're not. Good luck with your project, but please understand that if we had an article on every web site (all of which are important to their creators) we would have millions of articles to manage. --kingboyk 18:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- P.S. There's a place on meta where you can announce new Mediawiki sites. --kingboyk 18:20, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn web site. MCB 03:08, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.