- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. TheProject 21:50, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A one week-old game hardly has sufficient notability for inclusion in Wikipedia (even if it is a Wikipedia-related game Rklawton 16:36, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a time limit for how long something should exist before its put on Wikipedia? User:macm is 17:59 (GMT)
- Yes. It should first exist long enough to become notable. Rklawton 17:18, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It doesn't matter how long something exists, the bottom line is that Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 17:02, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom ॐ Priyanath 17:16, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.--Fuhghettaboutit 17:20, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- SPeedy Delete this is actually listed (under the name "wikipedia game") at WP:NFT. It's already been deleted dozens of times under dozens of names. --Bachrach44 18:29, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete and tagged per G4 as something Wikipedia has seen about a billion times. TheProject 20:47, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.