Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikikreator

Wikikreator

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Wikikreator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. All sources are from the creators of this tool. Fram (talk) 08:19, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 08:19, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for various obvious reasons WP:NOPAGE JMWt (talk) 08:37, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  presenting the topic on a dedicated standalone page, but it is not required that we do so; at times it is better to cover a notable topic as part of a larger page about a broader topic, with more context--- The article written here is new and needs more time to reach 10000 words. Isolatedchimpanzee (talk) 08:47, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment: Wikikreator is a tool of Wikipedia, you obviously need an article on the matter. Moreover whoever is calling out that most of the references are from creator himself, he needs to check it out again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isolatedchimpanzee (talk • contribs) 08:52, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  We have policies against AI, it would be weird to then have a page describing a tool that does it.

  Also it isn't a tool of wikipedia as far as I know in that it isn't a bot which is maintained and reviewed on en.wiki. JMWt (talk) 10:18, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  You tried to give a good point but you are forgetting that much of assistance tool in Wikipedia are Ai powered, but you are right it is not "maintained" anymore. Isolatedchimpanzee (talk) 15:17, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I don't know what this means. JMWt (talk) 15:33, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  No problem. Let me try again. 1. You are not right to say that Wikipedia is against AI, because Wikipedia makes a great use of AI tools in day to day functions. And saying it does not will be hypocrisy (by definition). I am not sure if it is your opinion. 2. You are right WikiKreator no longer exist as online, however it was "that automatically expands short Wikipedia “stubs” into fuller articles by leveraging information". Isolatedchimpanzee (talk) 15:48, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • It was a tool "that......

  Isolatedchimpanzee (talk) 15:48, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Also this particular article is written for requested articles, so I do not consider it as promotion. Isolatedchimpanzee (talk) 15:51, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  None of that makes any sense. JMWt (talk) 15:59, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete absolutely no indication that this is notable, no independent coverage that I can find. Driftingdrifting (talk) 10:16, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, not notable. Caleb Stanford (talk) 16:44, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails GNG --tony 02:22, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]