- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:56, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable wiki; appears to fail WP:WEB. (ESkog)(Talk) 00:38, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Also, it appears to be an advertisement. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:56, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete Nonsense added on by red link.--Jersey Devil 01:14, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above. SorryGuy 01:16, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: wiki has only been running for 2-3 weeks and contains only 5 articles. --BillC 01:24, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Deletetics -- RoySmith (talk) 01:26, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Sheehan (Talk) 02:37, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete site isn't yet notable. Press release at best. At worst, authored by someone connected to the site. LookNorth 03:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy it. Could make a good Wikipedia essay some day. savidan(talk) (e@) 08:31, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable enough. --Siva1979Talk to me 09:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above users -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 22:20, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.