- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – Robert T | @ | C 00:08, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
A google search for this term finds nothing. Appears to be either a hoax, or somebody's private invention. Either way: not encyclopedic, delete. - Mike Rosoft 21:03, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, OR, and uses "Wikipedia" as a generic term for all wikis, which is something we do not want to encourage. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:47, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable, non-encyclopedic. Revived 22:29, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Everyking 03:02, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not encyclopedic MONGO 02:06, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per everyone else. Stifle 00:30, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.