- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as patent nonsense, it's called wikiality, not wikireality! - Mailer Diablo 05:02, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable neologism per WP:NEO, and just because it was invented by Stephen Colbert on cable television doesn't automatically mean its notable. My original prod was removed by page creator. hateless 00:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete by having a triple-sized herd of elephants stomp on it. NawlinWiki 00:12, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Non-encylopedic. Protologism with aim of abuse of Wikipedia but no evidence of wide usage Bwithh 00:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless it gets news stories written about it like Truthiness did, which doesn't seem too likely. Recury 00:55, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete never even heard the term used before Konman72 00:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Plus, I watched the video, it's not even called "Wikireality", it's called something else. Kalani [talk] 01:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. NEO. SynergeticMaggot 01:12, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NEO Betacommand 01:24, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. And for the record, it was "Wikiality" - not "Wikireality". Czj 02:13, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Colbert didn't even use it: the word was "Wikiality" which already has a redirect in place to The Colbert Report. — Dark Shikari talk/contribs 02:29, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete as a non-notable protologism and a failed attempt at Colbertcruft. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 02:55, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the obvious VoiceOfReason 03:18, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:COLBERT (I might just start it)...also a WP:NEO alphaChimp laudare 04:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete That wasn't even the word... Nick Catalano contrib talk 04:14, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment While the outcome of this deletion is obvious, the closing admin may want to consider salting the article, as Colbert Report-related articles like this are likely to recieve a lot of traffic and probably be recreated. In any case, at least watching this deleted article by a few wikipedians is probably in order. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 04:46, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.