Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikispiracy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non notable per WP:WEB. 21 articles since 1st Jan says a lot. Dweller 13:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. MER-C 13:20, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom. I would also discourage the creator of this article from writing about projects he is involved in and writing about himself per WP:VANITY. Wickethewok 14:34, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom; no WP:RS indicating that site meets WP:WEB. It was created a few days ago... WP:CHILL applies. --Kinu ^t/_c 16:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:WEB.-- danntm ^T _C 16:57, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom. Simões (^talk/_contribs) 17:06, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete conspiracycruft and per everyone. Danny Lilithborne 19:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Brand new project, no notability achieved yet. Wikipedia is not for promoting new ventures. Fan-1967 20:14, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:WEB. --Nishkid64 23:08, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator. Yamaguchi先生 23:51, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all above. Wikipedia is not a wiki directory. eaolson 23:53, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Wryspy 19:15, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The project has been live for three days. This violates so many policies and guidelines- WP:WEB, verifiability, reliable sources, notability, crystal balling, and more. --Wafulz 04:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Wafulz. GassyGuy 08:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:WEB Echalone 23:39, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

The article is intended as a short article which will provide the reader with an understanding of the wikispiracy project.

• To describe the wiki in a manner that is in keeping with other articles on wikis that are currently listed
• To include the wiki in the wikipedia List of wikis page

• This article is in no way intended as a form of self promotion. I note user:Wickethewok's comments. (I have removed the small reference to my submission of articles to the wikispiracy. This was an oversight on my behalf)
• It is not intended as a form of promotion of the site which went live (was put available on the Internet) only a few days ago.
• It does not contain any original material

If it went live only a few days ago how is even it notable? Unless 10,000 users appeared from the heavens making it an amazing event that wikipedia must report about? come back in twelve months --Charlesknight 22:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was somewhat amazed at the overzealous rapidity of this marking for deletion. I think the actual article was up for literally seconds before it was earmarked for annihilation. At least this provides evidence that the Wikipedia is an active thriving community.

I also respect the Wikipedia for being an open project. It is a project built upon open source software and open thinking. No corporation nor any government could have created such a successful project as the wikipedia which largely survives on the free energy and enthusiasm of unpaid yet very loyal people. Irrespective of what the wikipedian community has decided of and about itself, there is indeed an uplifting and empowering feeling that comes from such success. zorg 16:57, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This project went live 15 September 2006. It runs entirely on open source software including mediawiki-1.6.8 using PHP 4 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zorgrian (talk • contribs) 11:01, 18 September 2006.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.