Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wim van mierlo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 16:10, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wim van mierlo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non notable academic per WP:PROF. Kudret abi^Talk 05:49, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Neither the article nor ghits go anywhere near establishing the criteria for notability under WP:PROF. There appears to be very little independent recognition of his work. Poor guy. --Mkativerata 06:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. —David Eppstein 07:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.