Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Win-win situation
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was boldly redirected to win-win game. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 20:06, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
one line dicdef thats already in wiktionary. unlikely to grow. delete. BL kiss the lizard 04:16, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to win-win game. Jamie 05:06, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Boldly redirected to win-win game. Jamie 07:03, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to win-win game. Capitalistroadster 05:13, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - can you show us where it exists in wiktionary? I couldn't find it. [1]. I am also not remotely convinced that this is suitable for a dictionary. I think that it has much more worth in an encyclopaedia, due to its cultural significance. And that's a "win-win situation" for everyone :) Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 10:40, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh and *ahem* someone redirected in the middle of an AFD discussion. To see its contents, click here: [2]. There I was thinking that "win-win game" is totally different to "win-win situation". lol. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 10:41, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.