- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. bainer (talk) 03:28, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The company is not exactly unnoteworthy, but this is advertising spam nonetheless. Delete. —HorsePunchKid→龜 2005-12-02 09:00:01Z
- Delete: Commercial advertising. Hu 09:18, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete spam. Gazpacho 10:49, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Page updated to be more informative 13:13, WinWAP Representative 2 December 2005 (GMT+2)
- Keep as useful info. Nom himself says its notable. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 16:04, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I did indeed, but that's completely orthogonal to my opinion that the article is (was) garbage. I was actually concerned that much of it may have been copyvio, but I didn't have the time to check, unfortunately. The edits by anon have improved it somewhat, though it's still in serious need of {{cleanup}}. —HorsePunchKid→龜 2005-12-02 21:31:50Z
- Borderline: the page has been shorn of some of its overt advertising, but it still reads as promotional. I guess I'd say, Send to clean up and keep after NPOV tone is inserted. Geogre 19:34, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.