- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 23:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Wireless art (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Delete unsourced WP:DICDEF. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unsourced WP:DICDEF. Frank | talk 20:22, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Verifiability is an issue for this article which does not cite any reliable sources. Stifle (talk) 22:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per WP:DICDEF. Malinaccier (talk) 22:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:45, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This is a recognised art genre with plenty of scope for expansion with encyclopedic material from sources such as these and many others. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:35, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete looks like a neologism fit for Wiktionary if it were in common use. (jarbarf) (talk) 22:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.