- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 19:22, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Wirex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A directory-like listing on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage to meet WP:CORPDEPTH not found; what comes up is passing mentions, routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Brahiim123 with no other contributions outside this topic. PROD removed by a user with two edits: Special:Contributions/Vance Carver. Does not meet WP:NCORP. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:14, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:24, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:24, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:25, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - My search only found the typical crypto blogs which are not reliable. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:26, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as it stands - David Gerard (talk) 16:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.